Welcome to Term of Art Collective, where art imitates law.

This project exists at the intersection of law and the facts that shape it. The Collective is made up of a group of artists from around the globe who have applied their artistic touch to depict some of the most famous and well read cases of American and English jurisprudence.

As Charles Bukowski once said, “An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way.” This project attempts to illustrate just that. Pun intended.

Each work is available as a fine art print for your home, school, or office collection, printed on 100% cotton archival fine art paper, acid and lignin free—the highest quality paper printed with the finest pigment ink for stunning color and clarity.

**MIRANDA V. ARIZONA**
384 U.S. 436 (1966)

**PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD CO.**
248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928)

REGINA V. DUDLEY AND STEPHENS14 Q.B.D. 26th 73 (1884) — **REGINA V. DUDLEY AND STEPHENS**
14 Q.B.D. 26th 73 (1884)

PIERSON V. POST3 Cai. R. 175, 2 Am. Dec. 264 (1805) — **PIERSON V. POST**
3 Cai. R. 175, 2 Am. Dec. 264 (1805)

**BYRNE V. BOADLE**
2 Hurl. & Colt. 722, 159 Eng. Rep. 299 (1863)

Click on each work to find out more about available sizes and pricing.

PETITIONS OF THE KINSMAN TRANSIT COMPANY 338 F.2d 708 (2d Cir. 1964) — **PETITIONS OF THE KINSMAN TRANSIT COMPANY**
338 F.2d 708 (2d Cir. 1964)

LOVING V. VIRGINA388 U.S. 1 (1967) — **LOVING V. VIRGINA**
388 U.S. 1 (1967)

DODGE V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY204 Mich. 459 (Mich. 1919) — **DODGE V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY**
204 Mich. 459 (Mich. 1919)

OBERGFELL V. HODGES 576 U.S. 644 (2015) — **OBERGFELL V. HODGES**
576 U.S. 644 (2015)

SILVERMAN V. KING247 N.J. Super. 534 (App. Div. 1991) — **SILVERMAN V. KING**
247 N.J. Super. 534 (App. Div. 1991)

RIDEAU V. LOS ANGELES TRANSIT 124 Cal. App. 2d 466 (1954) — **RIDEAU V. LOS ANGELES TRANSIT**
124 Cal. App. 2d 466 (1954)

VOSBURG V. PUTNEY80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. 403, 403 (1891) — **VOSBURG V. PUTNEY**
80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. 403 (1891)

UNION OIL CO. V. OPPEN501 F.2d 558, 560 (9th Cir. 1974) — **UNION OIL CO. V. OPPEN**
501 F.2d 558, 560 (9th Cir. 1974)

GRIMSHAW V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY119 Cal. App. 3d 757 (1981) — **GRIMSHAW V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY**
119 Cal. App. 3d 757 (1981)

KIRKSEY V. KIRKSEY8 Ala. 131 (1845) — **KIRKSEY V. KIRKSEY**
8 Ala. 131 (1845)

Term of Art Collective LLC Los Angeles, CA All Rights Reserved